HR Restructuring - The Coca Cola & Dabur Way
 
			
	 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	  	
		
			 | 
			
	  | 
			
 
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
  
Case Details:
  
Case Code : HROB003 
Case Length : 08 Pages 
Period : 1995-2001 
Organization : Coca Cola India Limited, Dabur 
Pub Date : 2002 
Teaching Note : Available 
Countries : India 
Industry : Food, Beverages & Tobacco 
 
To download HR Restructuring - The Coca Cola & Dabur Way case study 
(Case Code: HROB003) click on the button  below, and select the case from the list of available cases: 
  
 
  
Price: For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 200;  For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 200 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges 
 
 
 » Human Resource and Organization Behavior Case Studies 
 » HRM Short Case Studies 
 » View Detailed Pricing Info 
 » How To Order This Case  » Business Case Studies » Area Specific Case Studies 
» Industry Wise Case Studies 
» Company Wise Case Studies
  
 
 
 Please note:
  
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
 | 
		
		
| 
 << Previous 
Excerpts
Restructuring the Mess
The Coca-Cola Way 
 
In 1999, following the merger of Coca-Cola's four bottling operations (Hindustan Coca-Cola Bottling North West, 
Hindustan Bottling Coca-Cola Bottling South West, Bharat Coca-Cola North East, and Bharat Coca-Cola South East), 
human resources issues gained significance at the company. Two new companies, Coca-Cola India, the corporate and 
marketing office, and Coca-Cola Beverages were the result of the merger. The merger brought with it over 10,000 employees to 
Coca-Cola, doubling the number of employees it had in 1998.
 
	
		| 
 
Coca-Cola had to go in for a massive restructuring exercise focusing on the 
company's human resources to ensure a smooth acceptance of the merger. The first 
task was to put in place a new organizational structure that vested profit and 
loss accounting at the area level, by renaming each plant-in-charge as a profit 
center head. 
 
The country was divided into six regions as against the initial three, based on 
consumer preferences. Each region had a separate head (Regional General 
Manager), who had the regional functional managers reporting to him. All the 
Regional General Managers reported to VP (Operations), Sanjiv Gupta, who 
reported directly to CEO Alexander Von Bohr (Bohr)... 
		 | 
		 | 
	 
 
The after Effects
		
		Both Coca-Cola and Dabur had to accept the fact that a major change on 
		the human resources front was inevitable, although the changes in the 
		two were necessitated by radically different circumstances. More 
		importantly, the restructuring seemed to have been extremely beneficial 
		for them. Besides improved morale and reduced employee turnover figures, 
		the strategic, structural and operational changes on the HR front led to 
		an overall 'feel-good' sentiment in the companies. 
	
		| 
 | 
		
		  In 1999, Coca-Cola reported an increase in 
			case-volume by 9% after restructuring. Volumes increased by 14% and 
			marketshare increased by 1% after the regionalization drive. The 
			company's improving prospects were further reflected with the 18% 
			rise in sales in the second quarter of 2000. However, in spite of 
			all the moves, Coca-Cola's workforce was still large. Given the 
			scale of its investments, the future was far from 'smooth sailing' 
			for the company. With the new found focus and a streamlined human 
			resources front, Coca-Cola hoped to break even by the end of fiscal 
			2001...  | 		
	 
 
 
 | 
			
				  |